In re Baranauckas
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCole, Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the final rejection by the Primary Examiner of the two product claims of appellants’ application No. 242,432 for patent on an allegedly new chemical compound and a process for producing it. The process claims of the application were allowed by the examiner.
The appealed claims are as follows:
21. A compound selected from the group consisting of 1,2,3,4-tetraehloro-cyclopentadiene-1,3 and a l,2,3,4-tetrachlorocyelopentadiene-l,3 wherein a ring chlorine atom has been replaced by a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Von BramerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Application of KebrichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- In Re StollCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Application of ShackellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- In Re CrosleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Monsanto Company v. Rohm and Haas CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Monsanto Company v. Dawson Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
- In Re: Thermolife International LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- In re ArkleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972