Legal Opinion
Strahm v. Fraser
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1916No. Civ. No. 1846PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff was employed by Vaughn & Fraser, a corporation, as assistant operator in a photographic studio at a salary of $90 per month. Subsequent to the rendition of the services Vaughn & Fraser transferred all of its properties to the defendant corporation, Fraser Studios. Plaintiff sued for labor and services rendered, joining as defendants George G. Fraser and Mary L. Fraser, individually and as trustees of Vaughn & Fraser, a corporation; George G. Fraser, doing business as Vaughn & Fraser; Vaughn & Fraser, a corporation, and Fraser. Studios, a corporation. The trial court…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hibernia Ins. v. St. Louis & New Orleans Transp. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1882
- Koch v. Speedwell Motor Car Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- San Francisco Protestant Orphan Asylum Society v. FitzsimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Blank v. Olcovich Shoe Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Pierce v. Riverside Mortgage Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Braren v. Reliable Carpet Works, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.