Legal Opinion

Morton v. Detroit, Bay City & Alpena Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1890PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Error to Alcona. (Simpson, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. 'The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, as administrator, to recover damages for the death of Thomas Harvey Morton, a former employé of the defendant. The plaintiff's intestate was on March 12, 1888, and for some time previous thereto had been, employed as a brakeman on one of the logging trains of defendant, running on a branch of its road, engaged principally in the carrying of long timber. On that day he was thrown, in some manner, from the train on which he was working, run over, and killed.

The plaintiff's case, as set up in the declaration, was that the intestate, while so employed upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. People v. EvansMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Beauchamp v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Johnson v. SpearMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Martin v. Des Moines Edison Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Choctaw, O. & G. R. v. HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. Vorbrich v. Geuder & Paeschke Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. McDonald v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Balhoff v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API