Grady v. Donahoo
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order refusing to vacate it. J. It. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Defendants failed to appear at the trial, and judgment was taken against them in their absence. They moved to vacate and set it aside immediately upon learning of the fact, upon the ground of surprise and excusable neglect. The motion was denied, and defendants appeal from the judgment and the order refusing to. vacate it.
It appeared that one D. M. Seaton had been retained by defendants as their attorney in the case, and he had put in an answer, but thereafter, and before the case was set for trial, Seaton removed from Fresno, where the parties reside and the case was pending, to San…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Watson v. Francisco & Humboldt Bay RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Dodge v. RidenourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by19 opinions
- Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Citizens' National Bank v. BrandenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Masten v. Indiana Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Greene v. Montana Brewing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.