Legal Opinion

Guthat v. Gow

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.)> Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Plaintiff sixes upon a written contract, by the terms of which he agreed, among other things, to build, construct, and completely finish for the defendant a two-story frame dwelling-house, except as to mason work other than plastering, according to drawings and specifications made by Marc J. Reiseger, architect, in a good, workmanlike, and substantial manner, under the direction of said architect, and to his satisfaction, to be testified by a certificate under his hand; and also, at his own expense, and under the direction and to the satisfaction of said architect, to “furnish such material,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hanley v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bush v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
  2. Carlini v. United States Rubber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Seim v. KrauseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Norton v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Weggner v. GreenstineMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API