Legal Opinion
United States v. Scott
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 11, 2003No. 02-2037-IEG(AJB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE A SUR-REPLY; and (3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE REQUEST TO FILE A SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM
GONZALEZ, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is plaintiffs motion for summary judgment to reduce to judgment certain tax assessments against defendant Neil Alan Scott. Additionally, both parties have filed ex parte applications seeking leave of the Court to file additional memoranda of points and authorities. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants plaintiffs motion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Act Up!/Portland v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Merlin Hansen Dolores Hansen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. GonzalesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- E.J. Harrison & Sons, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2011
- JTK Masonry Co. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
- United States v. HoweDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022
- United States v. MurdockDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2020