Legal Opinion
WildEarth Guardians v. National Park Service
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 9, 2013No. 11-1192PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal concerns WildEarth Guardians’ challenge to the National Park Service’s elk and vegetation management plan for Rocky Mountain National Park. Wild-Earth filed suit in federal district court challenging the plan and the final environmental impact statement the National Park Service (NPS) prepared in conjunction with the plan. WildEarth contends the NPS violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by failing to include the reintroduction of a naturally reproducing wolf population as one of the alternatives considered in the environmental impact…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wildearth Guardians v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- WildEarth Guardians v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- National Mining Association v. Ryan ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Sinclair Wyo. Ref. Co. v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Defenders of Wildlife v. U.S. Dept. of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.