Legal Opinion

Nestle's Food Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 9, 1929No. 3103PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court denying claims for refund of duties as drawback.

It appears from the record that appellant filed in the office of the collector at the port of Seattle a written notice of intent to export 12,883 cases of condensed milk, with benefit of drawback. The purpose of the filing of such notice was to secure a refund of duties paid on certain imported sugar used in the production of the milk. The notice contained the information that the merchandise was to be shipped on the S. S. President Jackson. The merchandise was sent to Smith’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Swan & Finch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. Missouri River Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Penick & Ford Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Lehn & Fink Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  5. Spencer, Kellogg & Sons (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pollak Industrial Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Dart Export Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. Romar Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  4. United States v. Ricard-Brewster Oil Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  5. Swan Tricot Mills Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API