Legal Opinion

Pollak Industrial Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 29, 1958No. C. D. 1991PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The merchandise covered by the two suits listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, was classified by the collector as “Straw hats sewed & colored — Not blocked or trimmed.” Duty was levied upon said merchandise at the rate of $2.50 per dozen, plus 25 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph 1504 (b) (4) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 52739, and also by T. D. 52857.

Plaintiffs claim said merchandise to be properly dutiable at the rate of $2 per dozen, plus 15…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kenyon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Goat & Sheepskin Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Nestle's Food Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  4. Nicholas v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. Donat & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ecuadorian Panama Hat Co. (S. Stern Henry & Co.) v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Ecuadorian Panama Hat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Ecuadorian Panama Hat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. Ecuadorian Panama Hat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. Ecuadorian Panama Hat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API