Swan Tricot Mills Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
This protest is directed against the refusal of the district director of customs at San Juan, Puerto Pico, to allow— pursuant to section 313(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended — a refund of duty as drawback on imported yarn allegedly not conforming to sample. The refund was disallowed because of the importer’s non-compliance with the requirements for drawback imposed by statute and regulations. Plaintiff concedes that it did not strictly comply with such requirements but claims it has substantially complied and, therefore, its claim for drawback should be allowed.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Swan & Finch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Nestle's Food Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Spencer, Kellogg & Sons (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Carl Matusek Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Romar Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- GAF Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- Garrett-Hewitt International v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970