Legal Opinion
Cruce v. Stein
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 1956No. Civ. 21480PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action in unlawful detainer brought under the provisions of section 1161a, subdivision 3, of the Code of Civil Procedure.
A fair résumé of the facts of the case is as follows: On or about July 24, 1947, J. R. Stein and Bernice C. Stein, his wife, executed and delivered a deed of trust wherein the Realty Title Company, Ltd., was named trustee and the property described was conveyed to it, as trustee, as security for the payment of the Steins’ indebtedness to Harry Bassett, who was the named beneficiary. The trust deed was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cheney v. TrauzettelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Shook v. BealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Hood v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Shook v. BealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Cobb v. California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY, ETC. v. CannonArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Wood v. HersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Old National Financial Services, Inc. v. SeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Gonzales v. Gem Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.