Legal Opinion

Clay v. New York Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 24, 1931No. 28,374PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

In an action upon the double indemnity feature of a life insurance policy, plaintiff recovered a verdict. Defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which was denied and judgment was entered, from which the defendant has appealed. The death of the insured was admitted, and the defendant paid the face of its life insurance policy but refused to pay the double indemnity under the provision which covered death resulting directly and independently of all other causes, from bodily injuries effected solely through external, violent, and accidental cause, but not if the death resulted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Lickleider v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  3. Standard Life & Accident Insurance v. SchmaltzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  4. Ludwig v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Frommelt v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Strommen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Gidlund v. Benefit Assn. of Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Krenz v. Krenz Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Plotke v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API