Legal Opinion

Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp. v. Carson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1951PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

The question for our decision in these consolidated cases is whether or not the appellants are liable for Sales taxes and Use taxes as applied by Chapter 3 of the Public Acts of 1947 as amended, Retail Sales Tax Statute.

Both of these taxes are privilege taxes and *154they have been defined by this Court as: “The Sales Tax imposes upon the seller a tax for the privilege of selling tangible personal property and is required to be paid by the seller. Hooten v. Carson, 186 Tenn. 282, 283, 209 S. W. (2d) 273. The Use Tax is a tax upon the privilege of using, consuming, distributing or storing-tangible…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Carson v. Roane-Anderson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. BoydTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Youngblood v. WallCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  4. Ruiz v. Walgreen Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  5. Mahoney v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API