Legal Opinion

Youngblood v. Wall

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 21, 1991PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiffs Robert and Patricia Young-blood appeal from the final decree of the trial court which 1) divested from them their interest in a certain property on Central Valley Road in Rutherford County, Tennessee, and vested it in defendants Howard and Sally Wall; 1 2) decreed a promissory note of $29,000.00, which was executed by Jack L. Johnson and payable to Youngblood, to be the sole and exclusive property of the Walls; 3) granted the Youngbloods the proceeds left from the resale of the Central Valley Road property after the payment of all costs, expenses, and taxes…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,629 C. L. Holloway Et Ux. v. Eugene HowerddCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. Carson v. Roane-Anderson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Blasingame v. American Materials, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  4. National Life & Accident Ins. v. MorrisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  5. McNeill v. Dobson-Bainbridge, Realty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Givens v. Mullikin Ex Rel. McElwaneyTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Tucker v. Sierra BuildersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  3. Harrogate Corp. v. Systems Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. BVT Lebanon Shopping Center, Ltd. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Parks v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API