Legal Opinion
Booher v. SHEERAM, LLC
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 15, 2010No. 20A03-1005-CT-338PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
An attorney was facing major surgery and attempting to work with an expert who was unable to get a report completed in a timely fashion. Consequently, the attorney contacted opposing counsel to explain that an extension of time to file his client's designated evidence in opposition to summary judgment would be needed. Opposing counsel agreed that an extension would be acceptable. Although we encourage collegiality among members of the legal profession, the attorney here should also have filed a formal request with the trial court for an extension of time. Having…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. CobbIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- HomEq Servicing Corp. v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Desai v. CroyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hopper v. Colonial Motel Properties, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by17 opinions
- Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc. v. Amco Insurance CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Schulz v. Kroger Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hale v. SS Liquors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Sharon Handy v. P.C, Building Materials, Inc., PC Properties, Llc, David A. Stemler, and Karen L. StemlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc. v. Amco Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.