Desai v. Croy
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Mukesh I. Desai, M.D. brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court's decision to allow Sherry Croy to respond to his Motion for Summary Judgment, as well as the court's subsequent denial of that motion. We address the following issues on review:
1. Whether the trial court erred when it allowed Croy to respond to Dr. Desai's summary judgment motion when Croy had failed to file a response or seek an extension of time within the thirty-day period allotted under Trial Rule 56(C).
2. Whether Dr. Desai is entitled to summary judgment.
We reverse and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Markley Enterprises, Inc. v. GroverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Wright v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Seufert v. RWB Medical Income Properties I Ltd. PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Riggin v. Rea Riggin & Sons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Geico Insurance v. RowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Borsuk v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- HomEq Servicing Corp. v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- James T. Mitchell v. 10th and The Bypass, LLC and Elway, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Murphy v. CurtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- DeLage Landen Financial Services, Inc. v. Community Mental Health Center, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.