Legal Opinion

City of Auburn v. Hedlund

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2009No. 80110-0PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

¶1 — Under Washington statutes, a person is not an accomplice to a crime if she is a victim of that same crime. Teresa Hedlund hosted a party where the liquor flowed freely. Following the party, Hedlund was the only survivor of a single car accident. Hedlund was seriously injured herself. She was charged in Auburn Municipal Court with (among other things) being an accomplice to driving under the influence (DUI) and reckless driving. At the close of the city of Auburn’s case in chief, the trial court dismissed the DUI and reckless driving charges because a victim may not be charged as an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gebardi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State v. NoltieWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. CrenshawWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. CroninWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. CroninWashington Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. BashawWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. BashawWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re Detention of PostWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In re the Detention of PostWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. BeadleWashington Supreme Court · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API