Brandhorst v. Special School District No. 1
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
We granted the petition for further review of Special School District No. 1 to consider issues similar to those raised in Strand v. Special School District No. 1, 392 N.W.2d 881, filed herewith.
Anticipating a substantial decrease in enrollment and a corresponding decrease in the budget for the 1984-85 school year, Special School District No. 1 for the City of Minneapolis determined that it was necessary to reduce its teaching staff by 401 teachers, 72 of which were non-probationary staff members. The six respondents here, all members of the district’s industrial arts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Strand v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Haak v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 625Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Brandhorst v. Special School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harms v. Independent School District No. 300Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Destache v. Independent School District No. 832Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Buys v. Independent School District No. 891Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Brandhorst v. Special School District Number 1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Palmer v. Independent School District No. 917Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996