Legal Opinion

Harms v. Independent School District No. 300

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1990No. CX-88-2226PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Chief Justice.

Respondent teacher, who previously had been placed on unrequested leave of absence (“ULA”) by appellant Independent School District No. 300, LaCrescent, Minnesota (“the District”), twice was not reinstated when the District reestablished a position. Instead, the District recalled two less senior teachers from ULA, refusing to realign its teachers to accommodate respondent. Respondent brought a declaratory judgment action to determine his right to recall and realignment under Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 6b (1988). The trial court held the District need only recall a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Ganyo v. Independent School District No. 832Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Foesch v. Independent School District No. 646Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Strand v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Berland v. Special School District No. 1, MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Ullom v. Independent School District No. 112Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. In the Matter of the Expulsion of A.D. From United South Central Public Schools No. 2134Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  4. Redeemer Covenant Church of Brooklyn Park v. Church Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Woodhall v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API