Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Haak v. Board of Education of Independent School District No. 625

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1985No. C1-83-1074PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Justice.

Appellants Kent Hinshaw, Ray Holzworth, Louis Haak, and Irene Cummings appeal from a district court judgment refusing to set aside their demotions but instead remanding the matter to respondent, St. Paul Board of Education (board), for further hearings and findings. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

As a result of declining enrollment and a budget deficit of almost $8 million, the board, at its February 2, 1982, meeting, eliminated 36 administrative positions and incorporated the duties and responsibilities into 15 new administrative positions. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Board of Education of City of Minneapolis v. SandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Foesch v. Independent School District No. 646Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of ItascaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Independent School District No. 810Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Strand v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. J.E.B. v. DanksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Jill Dauel v. Board of Trustees of Elgin Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Frye v. Independent School District No. 625Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API