Legal Opinion

Hall v. PUGET SD. BRIDGE & DRY DOCK CO.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1965No. 37235Published

1Opinion of the Court

66 Wn.2d 442 (1965)

403 P.2d 41

O.I. HALL et al., Appellants,

v.

PUGET SOUND BRIDGE AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, Respondent.[*]

No. 37235.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

June 10, 1965.

Culp, Dwyer, Guterson & Edwards, for appellants.

Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson & Uhlmann and W.E. Evenson, for respondent.

HAMILTON, J.

Plaintiffs, a father and son partnership, are contractors engaged in heavy construction work, and defendant, a corporation, is the owner and operator of a rock quarry in the Seattle area commonly known as the Riverton Quarry.

In June, 1960, plaintiffs were the successful…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. Payless Drug Stores of Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Lindberg v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Fannin v. RoeWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Hoyt v. Hainsworth Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Boley v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API