Legal Opinion

Fannin v. Roe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1963No. 36046PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

This is a personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident. Trial was commenced before a jury. At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence, the trial court sustained defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence and dismissed plaintiffs’ action. Plaintiffs’ appeal, assigning error to the trial court’s ruling.

A review of the record reveals the following version of the accident presented by plaintiffs’ evidence: On August 14, 1959, at about 8 p.m., plaintiff wife and her two young children were driving south on Bothel Way, between 137th and 138th Streets, in Seattle.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mouso v. Bellingham & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Miller v. Payless Drug Stores of Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Williams v. HoferWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Peterson v. BettsWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Lambert v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bohnsack v. KirkhamWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Lappin v. LucurellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Smith v. Seven-Eleven, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Archibald v. GossardWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. JelleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API