Shirley v. Dalby

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

These are appeals from judgments in two¡ ' separate mandamus actions in the same dis-; trict court. The judgment in each case refusing the writ is affirmed.

Causes No. 7600 and No. 7601 followed a parallel course through the District Court and appear to have as a single purpose the procurement of a decision defining the scope and limits of the discovery procedure authorized by Rules 167 and 186a, Vernon’s Rules of Civil Procedure. No order of consolidation was made in the trial court or here, the two cases in a general sense have been treated as one in both courts. P. H„…