Legal Opinion
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stroh
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1982No. C.D. 6869Published
1Opinion of the Court
97 Wn.2d 289 (1982)
644 P.2d 1161
In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HUGH W. STROH, an Attorney at Law. NORM MALENG, Prosecuting Attorney, Petitioner, WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, Respondent.
No. C.D. 6869.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
May 13, 1982.
David Boerner, Chief Criminal Deputy, Robert S. Lasnik, Deputy, and Norm Maleng, King County Prosecuting Attorney, pro se, for petitioner.
Kurt M. Bulmer, for respondent Bar Association.
James J. Lamont, Gerald B. Netzky, and Hugh W. Stroh, pro se, for respondent Stroh.
BRACHTENBACH, C.J.
We have been asked to review the…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Williams; Concurrence · Dolliver.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.