Legal Opinion
Matter of Costigan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 22, 1995PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
Petitioner Costigan was disbarred in December 1990 on account of a criminal conviction which concerned his mishandling of an estate. Now Costigan petitions this court for reinstatement pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 218(c)(6). On June 29 and July 13, 1993 a hearing committee heard the matter, and on January 6,1994 the committee filed its report, recommending that Costigan’s petition be granted. Neither party took exceptions and on June 13, 1994 the Disciplinary Board also recommended reinstatement. On July 26, 1994, this court entered a rule to show cause why an…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CostiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re IuloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re VerlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- In Re the Reinstatement of WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re PerroneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.