Legal Opinion

In Re Verlin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1999PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

This case involves Petitioner Verlin’s petition to be reinstated to the bar following his disbarment. On July 5, 1991, Verlin was convicted of criminal conspiracy, perjury, false swearing, and theft by deception. The criminal charges leveled against Verlin stemmed from his improper handling of two related personal injury actions. Following Verlin’s conviction, on November 30, 1995, this Court entered an order disbarring Verlin retroactive to September 4, 1992. Verlin now petitions this Court for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 218(c)(6) of the Pennsylvania Rules of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Matter of CostiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re IuloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. In Re the Reinstatement of WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re PerroneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. In Re GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. In Re PerroneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API