Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Osburn

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 1908No. Gen. No. 13,812PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Osoab M. Tobbison, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

The questions discussed by counsel for the parties, respectively, are whether the defendant, the Ford Motor Company, was a bailee for hire at the time of the fire; whether the retention of the automobile by defendant, from the time it received it till the time of the fire, was or not an unreasonable detention; whether defendant was liable for breach of warranty, and whether plaintiff had rescinded the contract.

The trial court, as is evident from remarks of the court, made just before finding for the plaintiff, was of the opinion that the defendant retained the automobile in its possession an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co. v. Mallory, Son & Zimmerman Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hunter v. Ricke Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Lincoln v. GayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Peoria Grape Sugar Co. v. TurneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Firemen's Fund Insurance v. SchreiberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Clemenson v. WhitneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  3. Woods v. BowmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  4. Nichols v. Union Stock Yards & Transit Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  5. Ryan v. Associates Investment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API