Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Talbott

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This action was brought to recover upon a promissory note. The complaint alleges that the note in question, a purported copy of which appears in the complaint, was made and executed by appellant on February 14, 1921, and delivered to defendant, W. O. Johnson, doing business under the name Changnon & Company. The principal amount of the note was $1,080, which was payable in twelve equal monthly instalments of $90 each, the first in-stalment being due and payable “one month after date.” It is next alleged that “before the due date of the first payment of said note” Changnon & Company indorsed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hall v. E. W. Wells & SonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  2. Galland v. JackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. McCorkle v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Sedgwick v. SedgwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Winter v. HutchinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Beasley Hardware Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Miles City Bank v. AskinMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. GarrardIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Bliss v. California Cooperative ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API