Legal Opinion

Gibbs-Brower International v. Kirchheimer Bros.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided May 10, 1985No. 84 C 5174PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Gibbs-Brower International (“GibbsBrower”) initially sued Kirchheimer Brothers Co. (“Kirchheimer”) and sole Kerchheimer stockholder Joe DeJure (“DeJure”), seeking to recover a commission and finder’s fee as the result of DeJure’s sale of all the outstanding shares of Kirchheimer stock to Canover Industries, Inc. (“Can-over”). Kirchheimer and DeJure then filed counterclaims against Gibbs-Brower alleging defamation. DeJure has now moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56 for summary judgment on Gibbs-Brower’s claim for a reasonable finder’s fee…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Chapski v. Copley PressIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Korf v. Ball State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Hermes v. HeinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sung v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
  2. Soule v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
  3. Cleland v. StadtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  4. Swartz v. City Mortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  5. Christopher Zyda v. Four Seasons Hotels and ResortsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API