Gibbs-Brower International v. Kirchheimer Bros.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Gibbs-Brower International (“GibbsBrower”) initially sued Kirchheimer Brothers Co. (“Kirchheimer”) and sole Kerchheimer stockholder Joe DeJure (“DeJure”), seeking to recover a commission and finder’s fee as the result of DeJure’s sale of all the outstanding shares of Kirchheimer stock to Canover Industries, Inc. (“Can-over”). Kirchheimer and DeJure then filed counterclaims against Gibbs-Brower alleging defamation. DeJure has now moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56 for summary judgment on Gibbs-Brower’s claim for a reasonable finder’s fee…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Chapski v. Copley PressIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Korf v. Ball State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Hermes v. HeinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sung v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
- Soule v. Hilton Worldwide, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
- Cleland v. StadtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- Swartz v. City Mortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Christopher Zyda v. Four Seasons Hotels and ResortsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.