Legal Opinion
Cleland v. Stadt
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 11, 1987No. 87 C 4218PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas Cleland brings this action against defendants Jerry Stadt, Stadt Agencies, Inc., and Penton/Industrial Publishing, Inc. The defendants move to dismiss. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motions to dismiss are denied.
I
Cleland’s complaint sets forth the following factual allegations which we take as true for purposes of this motion to dismiss. As a result of conversations between Cleland and Stadt, Cleland entered into an oral contract with Stadt and Stadt Agencies. Penton was not a party to the contract. Pursuant to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Medtronic, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Intermedics, Inc., a Texas Corporation, and Intermedics Illinois, Inc., a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Kozasa v. Guardian Electric Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- McIntosh v. Magna Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Hoopla Sports & Entertainment, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- United States Ex Rel. Roby v. Boeing Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- BMY—Combat Systems Division of Harsco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Strzelecki v. Schwarz Paper Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.