Jennings Buick, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The city of Cincinnati appeals,■ having set-forth the following propositions of law;
1. “The Court of Appeals is bound by stare decisis to follow established precedent which holds that a plaintiff cannot recover for injury from a water main break unless he proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the water supplier was negligent.”
2. “The maintenance by a city of over three thousand miles of water mains is not an inherently dangerous activity to which the doctrine of strict liability would -apply.”
3. “Before a water supplier can be held strictly liable for a break in a water main, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Metzger v. Pennsylvania, Ohio & Detroit Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
- Lubin v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Bridgeman-Russell Co. v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Quigley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- John T. Arnold Associates, Inc. v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Schoener v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Nationwide Insurance Co. v. JordanHamilton County Municipal Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.