Legal Opinion
Metzger v. Pennsylvania, Ohio & Detroit Rd.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 8, 1946No. 30334PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
In the course of this opinion, Dolores Metzger will be designated as plaintiff and The Ohio, Detroit & Pennsylvania Railroad Company and The Pennsylvania Railioad Company as defendants.
In the statement of facts it has been pointed out that the case was tried on the basis of nuisance. It should further be pointed out that The Pennsylvania, Ohio & Detroit Railroad Company was named a defendant as lessor, under the provisions of Section 8814, General Code, which makes a railroad company lessor and a railroad company lessee jointly liable for negligence growing out of the operation of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Hetrick v. Marion-Reserve Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- Armour & Co. v. OttOhio Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by51 opinions
- Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Kramer v. Angel's Path, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.