Legal Opinion
Quigley v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 22, 2012No. Civil Action No. DKC 11-3223PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for review in this consolidated tort action are three motions to dismiss filed by Defendant Washington ■ Suburban Sanitary Commission (“WSSC”). (ECF Nos. 13, 22, 27). The issues have been briefed, and the court now rules, no hearing being necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the following reasons, the motions to dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
Three cases are consolidated in this action: Quigley v. United States, No. DKC 11-3223; Ochoa v. United States, No. DKC 11-3224; and Barbosa u.…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Francis v. GiacomelliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Shirley Presley v. City of Charlottesville Rivanna Trails FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Osei v. University of Maryland University CollegeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- In re Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
- Mayor of Baltimore v. StokesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Allen v. McCroryDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Amanda Warren, et al. v. St. Mary's County, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.