Legal Opinion

Heslin v. Lapham

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1926No. Docket No. 5030PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.

An action for damages upon a contract for the construction of additions to a building.

Judgment was entered for plaintiff, from which defendant has appealed upon the judgment-roll, his grounds for reversal being that the action was not one upon a contract, obligation, or liability founded upon an instrument in writing, as found by the trial court, and was therefore barred under subdivision 1 of section 339 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

It was found, in accordance with the allegations of the complaint, that a contract in writing was entered into between the parties, by which appellant agreed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Reyburn v. CaseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  3. Murphy v. StellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Archer v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Gallagher v. Equitable Gas Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Corp. of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday Saints v. CavanaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Coley v. WolcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Burch v. Premier HomesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Steiner v. CroonquistAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1951
  5. Holmes v. RobartsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API