Heslin v. Lapham
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.
An action for damages upon a contract for the construction of additions to a building.
Judgment was entered for plaintiff, from which defendant has appealed upon the judgment-roll, his grounds for reversal being that the action was not one upon a contract, obligation, or liability founded upon an instrument in writing, as found by the trial court, and was therefore barred under subdivision 1 of section 339 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
It was found, in accordance with the allegations of the complaint, that a contract in writing was entered into between the parties, by which appellant agreed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- O'Brien v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Reyburn v. CaseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
- Murphy v. StellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Archer v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Gallagher v. Equitable Gas Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Corp. of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latterday Saints v. CavanaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Coley v. WolcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Burch v. Premier HomesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Steiner v. CroonquistAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1951
- Holmes v. RobartsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.