Legal Opinion
Naughright v. Weiss
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 18, 2011No. 10 Civ. 8451 (RWS)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The defendants, Donna Karan Weiss (“Karan”) and Urban Zen, LLC (“Urban Zen”) (collectively, the “Karan Defen*683dants”), and the defendant Stephen M. Robbins (“Robbins”) (collectively with the Karan Defendants, the “Defendants”), have moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the complaint of the plaintiff, Jamie A. Naughright (“Naughright” or the “Plaintiff’). Based on the conclusions set forth below, the motions are granted.
Prior Proceedings
The diversity complaint of Naughright against the Defendants was filed on November 8,…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ellington Credit Fund, Ltd. v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Oden v. Bos. Scientific Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Tears v. Bos. Scientific Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Romero v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- King County v. IKB Deutsche Industriebank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.