Legal Opinion
State v. Rieger
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 2006No. S-03-670PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHendry, C.J.
INTRODUCTION
This is a petition for further review from the Nebraska Court of Appeals’ opinion in State v. Rieger, 13 Neb. App. 444, 695 N.W.2d 678 (2005). The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s denial of the motion for postconviction relief of David W. Rieger, Jr. Riegér generally assigns that the Court of Appeals erred in computing the time limitation for trial under article III of Nebraska’s Agreement on Detainers.
STATUTORY SCHEME OF AGREEMENT ON DETAINERS
Before discussing the facts, it is helpful to review the statutory scheme around which this action revolves. Nebraska is a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Larry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. MolinaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. DeckardNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Betancourt-GarciaNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. SimsNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Interest of Jeffrey K.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.