Legal Opinion
Ware v. Nicklin Associates, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 3, 2008No. 1:08-cv-233PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Currently before the Court are defendant Nicklin Associates Inc.’s (“Nicklin”) Motion 1 to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and defendant Stericycle Inc.’s (“Stericycle”) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff, Gloria Ware, brought this lawsuit against Nieklin and its employees named as defendants and also Stericycle (collectively, the “defendants”) alleging race, age and sex discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Middlebrooks v. Godwin Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- JAIYEOLA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ellis v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Brown v. Children's National Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hutchinson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.