Legal Opinion
Middlebrooks v. Godwin Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 25, 2010No. Civil Action 09-02048 (ESH)PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lillie Middlebrooks, proceeding pro se, has sued defendants Godwin Corporation (“Godwin”), Janice Williams, Karen P. Watts, and the District of Columbia (“the District”) for discrimination on the basis of race and color, retaliation, and hostile work environment in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981; discrimination on the basis of race and color in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d; discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment in violation of the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Kingman Park Civic Association v. GrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Mason v. GeithnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- McKeithan v. BoarmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hajjar-Nejad v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.