Legal Opinion

Daiches v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 7, 1937No. 8403PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff below, a jeweler, sued on a policy of insurance protecting against loss and damage by robbery, alleging that his store had been robbed and he had suffered a loss of $6,683.30. The policy, for a premium of $112.50, insured plaintiff against loss up to $7,500 by robbery occurring “within the premises during the hours beginning 7 o’clock a. m. and ending 12 o’clock p. m. while the custodian and at least one other employee of the assured are on duty therein.”

In addition to the primary coverage of the policy, there was a “Change in Risk” or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  2. Goldberg v. Central Surety & InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Carolina Spruce Co. v. Black Mountain R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Security State Bank v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J. J. Newberry Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Rodin v. Director of PurchasingNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ralph Perri, Inc. v. Metropolitan Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  4. Seven South Main Street, Inc. v. Common Council of GloversvilleNew York Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API