Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 5, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Black, J.

There is but one controverted question on this appeal. The true construction and application of two clauses in a policy of burglary insurance. The trial resulted in the direction of a verdict for the defendant. This is the error assigned, as the ground of appeal. The facts are not in dispute. Substantially, they are these; The policy was dated December 4th, 1920. It contained these two clauses the only ones out of which grew the suit. Nnder the head *535Schedule (statements of assured) Warranties. (5) “An armed watchman with no other duties is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

Rickerson v. . Hartford Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by11 opinions

Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Triangle Industries, Incorporated, A/K/A Anc Holdings, Incorporated Triangle Pwc, Incorporated, & Third Party v. New Jersey Property-Liability Guaranty Association, on Behalf of Ideal Mutual Insurance Company, in Liquidation, Zurich-American Insurance Companies, 91-1685 Zurich Insurance Company, Third Party and Wausau Insurance Companies, Employers Insurance of Wausau, Third Party Westinghouse Electric Corporation, International Business MacHines Corporation, Olin Corporation, American Fiber Manufacturers Association, American Petroleum Institute, Chemical Manufacturers Association, Insurance Environmental Litigation Association, Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Triangle Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
Thomas Gray v. Joseph J. Brunetti Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
Krieg v. Phoenix Insurance Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.