Eulert v. Pennie
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco appointing an administrator with the will annexed of the estate of a deceased person. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
James Allen, a resident of the city and county of San Francisco, died in the month of October, 1887, leaving a will which was admitted to probate in December of that year. Margaret Allen, the widow of deceased, was appointed executrix of the will, and duly qualified as such.
On the second day of April, 1888, Mrs. Allen married one John F. Von Muegge, and has ever since been his wife. Four days later,—on the 6th of April,—Freder7 iclc Eulert filed in court a petition asking to be appointed administrator of the estate of deceased with the will annexed, and with his petition he also…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Estate of BeechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- In re Estate of CotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Estate of Stevenson v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Schroeder v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Estate of MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fresno Estate Co. v. FiskeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Abrahams v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Jennings v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- McMillan v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Estate of LindseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.