Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Town of Essex

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 23, 1989No. 87-030PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to compel the Town of Essex and its manager to allocate 144 sewer units to their planned single-family subdivision, “Essex Meadows,” to enjoin the Town from allocating sewer units to two competing residential projects, and to declare the Town’s Sewer Allocation Policy to be void. The case was heard on an agreed set of facts, plaintiffs were denied relief, and they appeal from the trial court’s order. We affirm the denial of the requested relief.

The trial court found that rapid development in Essex and the surrounding area in recent years had severely strained…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Hodel v. IrvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robes v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. Sunset Cay, LLC v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Knollwood Building Condominiums v. Town of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. Kurt Daims & Craig Newbert v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  5. Brennan Woods Ltd. Partnership v. Town of WillistonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API