Gaut v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Presiding Judge.
The accused was indicted and convicted of carnal knowledge of a girl under twelve years of age. Title 14, Sec. 398, Code 1940.
The defendant did not request the general affirmative charge. Neither did he file a motion for a new trial. In this state of the record the sufficiency of the evidence to' sustain the verdict is not presented for our review. Holmes v. State, 35 Ala.App. 585, 50 So.2d 800; Chambers v. State, 31 Ala.App. 269, 15 So.2d 742.
The girl in question was examined by a physician a few hours after the time of the alleged carnal knowledge. The solicitor asked…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carroll v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Chambers v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
- McQueen v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Holmes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Bryant v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
3Cited by3 opinions
- Driggers v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
- Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Wright v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953