Wright v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Presiding Judge.
The complaint in this case charges the accused with buying, selling, giving away, or having in his possession illegally, prohibited liquor.
There is also an allegation in the complaint that the defendant had been previously convicted of violating Sec. 98, Title 29, Code 1940.
The grounds of the demurrers to the complaint are so general in nature that the propriety of the court’s action in overruling them cannot be questioned. Hutcherson v. State, 25 Ala.App. 380, 147 So. 208.
For a full discussion of the right to include the allegations of prior convictions see Yates v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Yates v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Tucker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Bryant v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Kincey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Gaut v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.