Legal Opinion

Driggers v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1952No. 4 Div. 225PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Presiding Judge.

The indictment in this case charges assault with intent to rape. The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged.

The alleged assaulted party is Katherine Brantley.

The defendant did not request the general affirmative charge. Neither did he file a motion for a new trial. In this state of the record the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment of conviction is not presented for our review. Kincey v. State, ante, p. 301, 55 So.2d 368; Gaut v. State, ante, p. 365, 56 So.2d 120.

On cross examination the prosecutrix testified that she talked to some of her neighbors…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woodard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Helms v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Orr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Millhouse v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Tucker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haynes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Jackson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Pounders v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Bond v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API