McQueen v. Jones
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit was for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff; as a guest in defendant’s car.
The complaint sufficiently stated the cause of action and established duty to the g-uest in the car (Perkins v. Galloway, 194 Ala. 269, 69 So. 875, L. R. A. 1916E, 1190; Thomas v. Carter, 218 Ala. 55, 117 So. 634; Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. Fonville, 218 Ala. 566, 575, 119 So. 610; Wurtzburger v. Oglesby, 222 Ala. 151, 131 So. 9), and charged negligence in general terms — the negligent driving of the car and as a proximate consequence the car collided with another car, causing the injury. This pleading was…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Moulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Jackson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- York v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. CoursonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Birmingham News Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Carroll v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Moore v. CruitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.