Legal Opinion

McQueen v. Jones

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 25, 1932No. 2 Div. 997PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff; as a guest in defendant’s car.

The complaint sufficiently stated the cause of action and established duty to the g-uest in the car (Perkins v. Galloway, 194 Ala. 269, 69 So. 875, L. R. A. 1916E, 1190; Thomas v. Carter, 218 Ala. 55, 117 So. 634; Morgan Hill Paving Co. v. Fonville, 218 Ala. 566, 575, 119 So. 610; Wurtzburger v. Oglesby, 222 Ala. 151, 131 So. 9), and charged negligence in general terms — the negligent driving of the car and as a proximate consequence the car collided with another car, causing the injury. This pleading was…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Moulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Jackson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. York v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. CoursonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Birmingham News Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Carroll v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Moore v. CruitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API