Legal Opinion

In Re Fountain

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1977No. Crim. 8729PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Counsel for Petitioner.*

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (Gerald), P. J.

—Edward A. Fountain, through his attorney, petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus to relieve him from the consequences of failing to file a timely notice of appeal from a judgment convicting him of possessing a controlled substance for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351). Fountain had pleaded guilty and was sentenced tó prison. This court issued an order to show cause returnable before the superior court with directions to report back findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Fountain was represented by appointed counsel in the trial court. That counsel did…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re BenoitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re AtchleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. In Re FresquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In re SwindallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Slovensky v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. People v. Chadwick C.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. People v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. People v. CasillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. People v. STURNSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API