Legal Opinion

In Re Fresquez

California Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1967No. Crim. 10519PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

In 1962 Robert V. Fresquez, who was not represented by counsel, pleaded guilty to four counts of an indictment charging unlawful sale of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11531) and was sentenced to prison on each count, the terms to run consecutively. He did not appeal.

In 1966 attorneys for Fresquez, now an inmate at the California Men’s Colony, filed the instant habeas corpus petition, asserting that he did not effectively waive his right to counsel in the trial court and that his guilty pleas were induced by promises of District Attorney C. Keith Lyde, Sheriff Lawrence Gillick, and Police…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. DurenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Borror v. Department of InvestmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. In Re FountainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. People v. SmyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API