Bay v. Oklahoma Southern Gas, Oil & Mining Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from order in Chambers, Comanche County; by F. E. Gillette, Tidal Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
BukfORD, C. J.:
This is a petition in error for the purpose of having reviewed an order of the judge of the seventh judicial district, dissolving a temporary injunction. The cause is pending in the district court of Comanche county, and so far as we are advised, is not yet disposed of.
On July 17, 1902, the plaintiff in error, who was the plaintiff below, secured from the probate judge of Comanche county, in the absence of the district judge, a temporary injunction, restraining the defendants in error from trespassing upon certain lands occupied as a homestead. On August…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Colorado Coal & Iron Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Davis's Administrator v. WeibboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- King v. Amy & Silversmith Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Nevada Sierra Oil Co. v. Home Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
- Woodruff v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. McCutchenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1916
- Sneider v. Big Horn Milling Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- United States v. Ohio Oil Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1916
- Frazier v. Consolidated Tungsten Mines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Graham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.