Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1932No. 29,053PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission adverse to relator.

Eelator, an employe of respondent, received an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment on July 25, 1926. Eespondent recognized its duty under the workmen’s compensation act, paid relator compensation, and also paid the doctor and hospital for caring for him. On December 10, 1926, when relator returned to work the compensation payments ceased. July 16, 1927, relator claims he had to quit work because of the effects of the injury. He made application to the commission for additional…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. Excelsior Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Hertz v. Watab Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Conway v. Swift CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Hertz v. Watab Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Senske v. Fairmont & Waseca Canning Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Rosenquist v. O'Neil & PrestonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Casey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Johnson v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Schmoll v. J. W. Craig Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API